How well does the abstract represent and summarize the article’s major points and argument?.How well is the purpose made clear in the introduction through background/context and thesis?.With each category, we recommend identifying the strengths and weaknesses in each since that is a critical part of evaluation. They are broken down into different categories, but answering these questions will help you consider what areas to examine. To evaluate a source, consider some of the following questions. Depending on your writing context, some of these items may not be applicable. As you read, be sure to note important items like the thesis, purpose, research questions, hypotheses, methods, evidence, key findings, major conclusions, tone, and publication information. To do this, we recommend take notes, annotating, and reading the article several times before critiquing. If your assignment is to summarize the article only, please see our literature review handout.īefore getting started on the critique, it is important to review the article thoroughly and critically. Some disciplines, like Criminal Justice, may only want you to summarize the article without including your opinion or evaluation. However, as you engage with the research process, you are becoming immersed in a particular topic, and your insights about the way that topic is presented are valuable and can contribute to the overall conversation surrounding your topic. As a college student, this might sound intimidating. That means you will be expected to go beyond a simple summary of the article and evaluate it on a deeper level. This is an opportunity for you as a scholar to offer your qualified opinion and evaluation of how another scholar has composed their article, argument, and research. Schaie’s general emphasis on how to avoid ageist bias does not offer any specific examples of ageism in research, but Schaie’s approach to ageist bias provides an alternative perspective to my own viewpoint.For many kinds of assignments, like a literature review, you may be asked to offer a critique or review of a journal article. An article on avoiding ageist bias in research, discussing objective research design and how to report what the research actually demonstrates without adding value-laden assumptions. “Ageist Language in Psychological Research.” American Psychologist 48 (1993): 49-51. Contains a good bibliography and many informative tables and statistics of black wage-earners and mine owners. Johnstone very convincingly uses a Marxist analysis to portray the low-wage blacks as pawns of the bourgeois mine owners. Johnstone effectively examines the labor experience of nonwhites in South African gold mines from a sociological perspective, arguing that the structure of the labor system comes from the industrial capitalism of the mines. Class, Race, and Gold: A Study of Class Relations and Racial Discrimination in South Africa. This controversial essay has been tremendously influential in recent discussion of multicultural education but has received by no means universal assent. Achebe presents an interpretation of the function of the images of Others in the construction of cultural identity and identifies a pervasive need on the part of "the West" to denigrate and dehumanize Africa. A provocative essay by the influential Nigerian author Achebe on the prevalent image of Africa in the Western imagination, focusing on the racist dimensions of Conrad's Heart of Darkness. "An Image of Africa: Racism in Conrad's Heart of Darkness." Heart of Darkness. Ed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |